Spam calls by area code: FTC complaint statistics

Spam and robocall complaints by U.S. area code and state, built from the FTC's public Do Not Call data — state rankings normalized per 100,000 residents, the most-reported area codes, embeddable cards, and a full methodology. Refreshed monthly.

This is the FTC's Do Not Call complaint data made browsable by area code and state — the numbers the government publishes only as an annual PDF, updated monthly and normalized per 100,000 residents so states are actually comparable. Remember the twist: because scammers spoof local numbers, these rankings show where calls are reported, not where scammers sit.Updated August 2, 2026
320,466FTC complaints (rolling window)
47,856phone numbers reported
356geographic area codes
51states & DC ranked

The FTC receives millions of Do Not Call complaints a year but publishes the geographic breakdown only inside an annual PDF data book. This page turns the underlying public "Reported Calls" files into a live, sortable picture: which states generate the most complaints per resident, and which area codes show up most on caller ID — refreshed every month and free to embed.

What these numbers are — and aren't. They count consumer complaints in the U.S. FTC's Do Not Call database — unverified reports, not proof of wrongdoing. Because most scam calls spoof a real number or a local area code, a high count means an area code or state is being imitated and reported often, not that its residents are scammers. State rates also reflect how readily people report. areacode.fyi is not a consumer reporting agency and this data is not for any FCRA purpose (employment, credit, tenant, or insurance screening). Report unwanted calls at DoNotCall.gov.

Spam-call complaints by state (per 100,000 residents)

Every state and DC with at least one reported number, ranked by FTC Do Not Call complaints per 100,000 residents (2024 Census population). Per-capita normalization is what makes a small state comparable to a large one. Each row links to that state's area codes.

#StateFTC complaintsPer 100k residents
1District of Columbia5,436774
2Virginia12,453141
3Illinois13,764108
4Kentucky4,13190
5New York17,13786
6Florida14,45862
7Wyoming35060
8Delaware60558
9Colorado3,25355
10West Virginia88950
11New Jersey4,76450
12Connecticut1,78449
13Ohio5,71948
14Georgia4,85543
15Nevada1,40343
16Kansas1,26343
17Arizona3,07241
18California15,35239
19Idaho71035
20Maryland2,20135
21Minnesota1,98134
22Massachusetts2,42534
23Oklahoma1,39134
24New Hampshire46933
25Utah1,16633
26Michigan3,26132
27Alabama1,63632
28North Carolina3,47431
29Maine41329
30Washington2,27329
31Louisiana1,28528
32South Carolina1,51628
33Pennsylvania3,59427
34Arkansas84527
35Wisconsin1,53426
36Nebraska51526
37Texas8,00026
38Indiana1,73625
39Rhode Island27325
40Tennessee1,75824
41Missouri1,41523
42Iowa73323
43North Dakota17222
44Mississippi56919
45New Mexico40619
46Oregon75518
47Hawaii24117
48Vermont9114
49Montana15614
50Alaska9313
51South Dakota11412

Most-reported geographic area codes

Raw complaint counts — no per-capita rate here on purpose (see the FAQ). These are true geographic codes; the toll-free prefixes that dominate raw volume live on scam & spam area codes. Each links to its area-code scam page.

#Area codeRegionFTC complaints
1434Charlottesville, Virginia6,936
2315Syracuse, New York6,165
3217Champaign-Urbana, Illinois4,958
4321Cocoa, Florida4,120
5202Washington, District of Columbia3,461
6540Roanoke, Virginia3,360
7502Louisville, Kentucky2,519
8407Orlando, Florida2,235
9309Peoria, Illinois2,162
10771Washington, District of Columbia1,975
11470Atlanta, Georgia1,503
12224Arlington Heights, Illinois1,198
13440Hillcrest, Ohio1,175
14201Hackensack, New Jersey1,156
15213Los Angeles, California1,111
16585Rochester, New York1,108
17719Colorado Springs-Main, Colorado1,032
18949Irvine, California1,026
19614Columbus, Ohio999
20209Stockton, California937

How this compares with the FTC's headline figures

Our rolling-window tally covers 320,466 complaints against the 47,856 most-reported numbers — those reported three or more times. The FTC's full annual Do Not Call complaint volume is higher (about 2.6 million in FY2025) because it counts every one-off report too. So use these figures to compare states and area codes to each other, not as the FTC's national headline total. The direction of travel matches the FTC's published data books: toll-free debt-relief and imposter robocalls dominate volume, while spoofing spreads the geographic reports across every area code.

Methodology & sources

Complaint data. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission publishes its Do Not Call "Reported Calls" as daily CSV files. We aggregate a rolling window of roughly the last 12 months, keeping numbers reported three or more times, and group each by the area code shown on caller ID. Counts are refreshed monthly; the "updated" date above reflects the current data (August 2, 2026).

State rates. State complaint totals sum the geographic area codes assigned to each state in the official NANPA numbering database, then divide by that state's resident population (U.S. Census Bureau, Vintage 2024, July 1 2024 estimate) to give complaints per 100,000 residents. Toll-free and other non-geographic prefixes are excluded from the state rankings because they aren't tied to a place. Canada is excluded — the FTC data is U.S.-only.

What the counts mean. These are unverified consumer complaints, not confirmed scams. Caller ID is easily spoofed, so the area code on a complaint is where the call appeared to come from, not necessarily its origin. A high count reflects reported volume and reporting propensity — treat it as a relative signal, not an accusation against any number, person, or place. There is intentionally no per-capita rate for individual area codes (overlays and toll-free prefixes make it meaningless).

Sources

Embed this data

Free to reuse (CC0). Drop the national card on any page with this snippet — it stays current as the data refreshes, and carries a link back for attribution:

<iframe src="https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats-national.html" width="100%" height="340" style="border:0;max-width:520px" title="U.S. spam-call complaints — areacode.fyi" loading="lazy"></iframe>

For a single state, point the same iframe at https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/district-of-columbia.html instead — one card exists for every ranked state and DC. The cards are self-contained (no tracking, no site chrome) and set to noindex, so the credit flows through the visible attribution link.

All state embed URLs
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/district-of-columbia.html — District of Columbia
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/virginia.html — Virginia
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/illinois.html — Illinois
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/kentucky.html — Kentucky
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/new-york.html — New York
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/florida.html — Florida
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/wyoming.html — Wyoming
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/delaware.html — Delaware
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/colorado.html — Colorado
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/west-virginia.html — West Virginia
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/new-jersey.html — New Jersey
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/connecticut.html — Connecticut
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/ohio.html — Ohio
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/georgia.html — Georgia
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/nevada.html — Nevada
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/kansas.html — Kansas
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/arizona.html — Arizona
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/california.html — California
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/idaho.html — Idaho
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/maryland.html — Maryland
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/minnesota.html — Minnesota
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/massachusetts.html — Massachusetts
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/oklahoma.html — Oklahoma
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/new-hampshire.html — New Hampshire
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/utah.html — Utah
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/michigan.html — Michigan
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/alabama.html — Alabama
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/north-carolina.html — North Carolina
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/maine.html — Maine
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/washington.html — Washington
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/louisiana.html — Louisiana
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/south-carolina.html — South Carolina
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/pennsylvania.html — Pennsylvania
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/arkansas.html — Arkansas
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/wisconsin.html — Wisconsin
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/nebraska.html — Nebraska
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/texas.html — Texas
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/indiana.html — Indiana
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/rhode-island.html — Rhode Island
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/tennessee.html — Tennessee
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/missouri.html — Missouri
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/iowa.html — Iowa
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/north-dakota.html — North Dakota
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/mississippi.html — Mississippi
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/new-mexico.html — New Mexico
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/oregon.html — Oregon
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/hawaii.html — Hawaii
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/vermont.html — Vermont
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/montana.html — Montana
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/alaska.html — Alaska
  • https://areacode.fyi/embed/spam-stats/south-dakota.html — South Dakota

Keep exploring

Frequently asked questions

How are spam calls counted by area code and state?

We tally consumer complaints in the FTC's public Do Not Call "Reported Calls" data over a rolling ~12-month window (numbers reported three or more times), grouped by the area code shown on caller ID. State totals add up the geographic area codes assigned to each state and are then divided by that state's 2024 Census population to get complaints per 100,000 residents.

Does a high per-100k rate mean a state has the most scammers?

No. The rate reflects where numbers are displayed and how often residents report — not where callers actually are. Because most scam calls spoof a local number, a high rate usually means a state's area codes are imitated often, and that its residents report diligently. It is a signal of reported call volume, not of local wrongdoing.

Why is there no per-capita rate for individual area codes?

Population doesn't map cleanly to a single area code. Overlays stack two or more codes over the same region, new codes have few active lines, and non-geographic (toll-free) prefixes have no population at all. A per-100k rate at the area-code level would be misleading, so we publish raw complaint counts per area code and reserve per-capita normalization for states.

Can I embed or reuse this data?

Yes. The data is free and released under a CC0 public-domain dedication. Copy the iframe snippet in the "Embed this data" section for a national or single-state card, or link to this page. Attribution to areacode.fyi is appreciated and is built into every embed card.

How often is this updated?

Monthly. The figures recompute from the latest FTC Do Not Call files each time the dataset is refreshed, and the "updated" date on this page reflects the current data.

Sourced from the official NANPA (North American Numbering Plan Administrator) numbering database, current as of August 2, 2026. Refreshed monthly.